to posudzujes na zaklade jedneho clanku? precitaj si aj ostatne a uvidis ci cital celu bibliu.
to posudzujes na zaklade jedneho clanku? precitaj si aj ostatne a uvidis ci cital celu bibliu.
tak na dokaz tvojho zaveru si mohol poukazat na ten film:
http://www.youtube.com/homeproject
historia pisana tisice rokov dopredu. ved aj dnesne vlady ziju z krvi a potu ludu.
Separating Fact and Fancy
◆ Archaeology’s discoveries are sometimes used in attempts to contradict what the Bible says. The foolishness of using such material to try to discredit the Bible is emphasized in a recent issue of Science Digest: “If we believed the inscriptions found on any of the hundreds of royal tombs in the Valley of the Kings, every pharaoh through Egyptian history would have been a benign ruler interested only in the good of his people, humble in the sight of his gods and relentless in pursuit of his enemies.” The magazine adds that archaeologists “still must grapple to separate fact from fancy.”
rebel - precitaj si clanok teologa - Mojzis a Cervene more - a vysvetli nam preco sa touto historickou udalostou zaoberaju dnesni vedci a preco volaju Mojzisov efekt urcite spravanie hmoty.
http://teolog.blog.pravda.sk/2010/11/18/ mojzis-a-cervene-more/
Ked sa to tak vezme, tak evolucia je nabozenstvo...ludia veria bez toho, aby chapali a rozumeli.
ten vietor len sposobil aby dno mora vyschlo...ine zakony sposobili rozstupenie mora...
vysvetlili ako sa z nezivej hmoty stane ziva?
kreacionizmus skresluje biblicke pravdy. mozu evolucionisti vysvetlit ako vznikol zivot?
zaujimave porovnat tento clanok s tym na Veda a technika: clovek:
Roztvoril Červené more Mojžiš? Mohol to byť aj vietor, tvrdia vedci
Carl Drews z NCAR by pochopil viac, keby sa oboznamil s pracou tokijskych vedcov o ktorej hovori clanok teologa o Mojzisovom efektu:
http://teolog.blog.pravda.sk/2010/11/18/m ojzis-a-cervene-more/