mas to trosku pokrivene
uveris nicim nepodlozenemu klamstvu, ze :
"v Haagu povedali, že Miloševič nie je zodpovedný za vojnové zločiny v bosnianskej vojne"
a odo mna ziadas dokaz, ze to ICTY nepovedal ?
:DDD
ty nebudes delfin
mas to trosku pokrivene
uveris nicim nepodlozenemu klamstvu, ze :
"v Haagu povedali, že Miloševič nie je zodpovedný za vojnové zločiny v bosnianskej vojne"
a odo mna ziadas dokaz, ze to ICTY nepovedal ?
:DDD
ty nebudes delfin
co tak dat link na ten ocistujuci rozsudok v pripade Milosevic ?
nebude ?
nebude.
NEEXISTUJE!
je to len skoro od slova do slova prebrate klamstvo z ruskopropagandistickych webov
takze sa necudujem, ze sa ti paci
:)
ty : "Nie je dostatok dôkazov o tom, že Miloševič bol zapojený. "
ICTY : With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of
the Accused (Karadzic)
ICTY : Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict
:D
od zaciatku sa bavime o tvojom klamstve, ze Milosevic bol rozsudkom oslobodeny
NEBOL !
ROZSUDOK V MILOSEVICOVOM PRIPADE NEEXISTUJE !
(len odvadzas pozornost, pretoze vies, ze klames)
nechapem preco sa tu rusi vytesuju nad zdrazenim ropy
ved ste nas presviedcali, ze rusko zacne predavat ropu na vlastnej komoditnej burze za vlastnu (ruskom urcenu) cenu
hehee
preloz toto :
Milosevic (member of JCE) shared and endorsed the political objective of the Accused (Karadzic).
Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.
"v Haagu povedali, že Miloševič nie je zodpovedný za vojnové zločiny v bosnianskej vojne"
az na to, ze nepovedali
:DD
a Milosevicov rozsudok zase nikde
:DD
ziaden rozsudok ani verdikt v Milosevicovom pripade neexistuje
to, ze sa Milosevic spomina v tom Karadzovicovom rozsudku je pochopitelne, kedze spolupracovali
Karadzovicov rozsudok ma 2615 stran a rusofilni konspiratori spolocne so srbskymi revizionistami sa odvalaju na par viet o Milosevicovi, ktore sa v nom nachadzaju
ubohe a vhodne pre jednoduchsie publikum - ved prave RussiaToday prisla s tymto klamstvom o "ocisteni Milosevica"
je to blud
3275. Beginning in November 1990, Milošević and the Accused had a close association and the
Accused would visit him frequently in Belgrade.10510 Other Bosnian Serb leaders such as Krajišnik
also met with Milošević but their meetings were less frequent.10511 Prior to the start of the conflict
and into 1992, Slobodan Milošević and the Accused were in constant communication with each
other to discuss and co-ordinate both political and military tactics in relation to developments in
BiH and Croatia.10512 There was a close connection between the authorities in Pale and Belgrade,
and the Bosnian Serb leadership consulted with Belgrade on developments in BiH.10513 Points of discussion included (i) their opposition to the secession of BiH and the desire to remain part of
Yugoslavia;10514 (ii) opposition to the creation of an Islamic State;
10515 (iii) political
negotiations;10516 (iv) regionalisation;10517 (v) developments in Croatia and Slovenia;10518 (vi)
military preparations including mobilisation of the Serb population and the provision of arms;10519 (vii) developments in Krajina;10520 and (viii) issues pertaining to recognition of the independence of
BiH.10521
z rozsudku pre Karadzica :
3274. Slobodan Milošević was the President of the Republic of Serbia.10506 Milan Babić
described Milošević as “the president of all Serbs, not only those in Serbia”10507 and was referred to
by Jovica Stanišić as the “main boss”.10508 He had control over the JNA.10509
tandem :Po niekoľkoročnom súdnom procese padol finálny verdikt. Haagsky tribunál oslobodil Slobodana Miloševiča v plnom rozsahu.
dal si sem rozsudok pre Karadzica.
tak kde je ten pre Milosevica, ktory ho ma ako tvrdis oslobodit v plnom rozsahu?
NEEXISTUJE!
vsetky tieto klamstva o ocisteni Milosevica vychadzaju z tohto odstavca z rozsudku z Karadzicovho pripadu
3460. With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his
membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of
the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation
or independence of BiH and co-operated closely with the Accused during this time. The Chamber
also recalls that Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the
Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.11026 However, based on the evidence before the Chamber
regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships
during the conflict and in particular, Milošević’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies
and decisions made by the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership,11027 the Chamber is not
satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milošević
agreed with the common plan.
err : aj ked mame svoje "parametre" definovane spravne -->
aj ked mame svoje "parametre" definovane rozdielne
obidvaja mame 1A
a obidvaja mame uplne rovnake vakuum pripravene v tom istom laboratorii s tymi istymi parametrami
rozdiel je v tom, ze moj 1 amper je schopny posobit silnejsie len preto, ze som mu taku schopnost pripisal (vymyslel) a tym padom som urcil (len tak z brucha) aj permeabilitu vakua
to ze kazdy mame vakuum s uplne rovnakymi parametrami tomu neodporuje, pretoze ako som uz hovoril "permebalita vakua" nema nic s spolocne s jeho fyzikalnymi vlastnostami. preto sa aj po novom radsej pouziva termin "magneticka konstanta"
a aj ked tvoja magneticka je zase ina, obidva nase systemy by stastne pocitali spravne, aj ked mame svoje "parametre" definovane spravne
v com by sa nase ampere lisili je ale mnozstvo preneseneho naboja za jednu sekundu a to je presne dovod preco novonavrhnuta definicia operuje s presnym poctom naboja prenesenym za jednu sekundu
bohuzial stale nic a zase ukazujes, ze si uplne mimo
raz hovoris, ze je "10^-7 odvodené z ampérovho silového zákona", potom zase rozpravas o nejakom merani? coze? merani?
vravis, ze si prestudoval cgs, ale ani tak si nepochopil, ze zakladny trik v tejto definicii ampera je cez DEFINICIU miery jeho siloveho posobenia (pamataj cgs!)
alebo inak - ja napriklad poviem, ze "ak rovnaké prúdy dvoma vodičmi nekonečne dlhé, rovnomerne vedľa seba vzdialené 1m, zanedbateľného prierezu na 1m dĺžky vo vákuu vytvoria silu 2*0,0000005N, tečie nimi prúd 1A"
ty povies : "ak rovnaké prúdy dvoma vodičmi nekonečne dlhé, rovnomerne vedľa seba vzdialené 1m, zanedbateľného prierezu na 1m dĺžky vo vákuu vytvoria silu 2*0,0000001N, tečie nimi prúd 1A"
co z toho vyplyva ? je moj amper iny ako tvoj ? alebo moje vakuum je ine ako tvoje ?
Odporúčame